Global Overview of Obstetric Violence

Explore key international research, legal frameworks, and public policy responses to promote respectful, evidence-based maternity care.

Obstetric Violence in the EU

Current Challenges and Next Steps

Across the European Union, obstetric violence is increasingly recognized as a form of gender-based and institutional violence, as well as a violation of human rights. Defined by the Council of Europe as non-consensual and inappropriate medical interventions during childbirth, this phenomenon is gaining visibility in both public discourse and policy discussions.

There is no harmonized legal framework across the EU. Portugal stands out as the only Member State with a national law explicitly promoting respectful maternity care. While most Member States rely on general Patients' Rights or Healthcare Acts, these often fall short in preventing violations such as lack of informed consent or abusive clinical practices. Regional legislation defining obstetric violence exists only in parts of Spain.

Clinical practices vary widely. Euro-Peristat data show high rates of caesarean sections, episiotomies, and induced labour in several countries—procedures which, when overused, may indicate obstetric violence. Routine use of such interventions, contrary to WHO recommendations, is still common in some Member States.

Data collection is inconsistent, and methodologies differ, making comparisons difficult. However, studies show that 21% to 81% of women report at least one form of mistreatment during childbirth. Disparities in experience are also linked to race, age, socioeconomic status, and health conditions.

Civil society organisations, health professionals and national institutions have launched a variety of initiatives: publishing clinical guidelines, offering targeted training, raising awareness, and supporting legal action. Observatories on obstetric violence are active in five countries, and advocacy efforts are growing.

Despite increased research and public concern, a comprehensive EU-wide strategy remains absent. The structural drivers—gender inequality, medical hierarchies, and harmful stereotypes—require systemic responses to ensure respectful and evidence-based maternity care across all Member States.

A Short Overview

Obstetric violence is not explicitly defined in EU or national laws, which hampers the development of legal frameworks and coordinated policies. The term itself is debated—some prefer “abuse” or “mistreatment” over “violence,” a choice criticized for ignoring power and gender dynamics.

There is no unified framework to address obstetric violence across Member States, and data collection is limited. However, available studies reveal high rates of non-consensual care, over-medicalisation, and disrespectful treatment during childbirth. Between 21% and 81% of surveyed women report having experienced some form of obstetric violence.

Although some initiatives exist—such as training, legal cases, and awareness campaigns—responses remain fragmented. A stronger, more coordinated legal and policy response is needed, recognizing obstetric violence as a form of institutional and gender-based violence.

Frequently Asked Questions

This set of questions provides a clear summary of the current understanding, causes, consequences, and responses to obstetric violence in the European Union. Based on institutional findings, it aims to support awareness, training, and policy development.
1What is obstetric violence and how is it defined in the EU context?
Obstetric violence refers to inappropriate, non-consensual, or abusive practices during childbirth. It includes physical and verbal abuse, lack of informed consent, and violations of dignity and autonomy, and is considered a form of gender-based, institutional, and human rights violence.
2Why is the absence of a common definition of obstetric violence problematic?
Without a shared definition, it is difficult to create consistent legal frameworks, policies, and practices across EU Member States, which limits effective responses and recognition of the issue.
3What are the main forms of mistreatment identified during childbirth?
Forms include physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal abuse, non-consensual care, discrimination, abandonment, detention, and poor communication between women and healthcare providers.
4Which systemic factors contribute to obstetric violence?
Contributing factors include discriminatory laws, gender stereotypes, power imbalances, over-medicalisation, healthcare system constraints, and misuse of the concept of medical necessity.
5How prevalent is obstetric violence in the European Union?
Studies show a wide prevalence, with 21% to 81% of surveyed women reporting at least one form of obstetric violence. However, data collection is limited and not standardised across countries.
6What are the consequences of obstetric violence for women?
Consequences include psychological trauma, impaired maternal–infant bonding, reduced trust in the healthcare system, and avoidance of future medical care or childbirth.
7Are there any EU Member States with specific laws addressing obstetric violence?
Portugal has a national law promoting respectful maternity care. Spain has regional legislation defining obstetric violence, but no Member State has a national law directly defining and addressing it.
8What initiatives exist to address obstetric violence in the EU?
Initiatives include training for healthcare professionals, awareness campaigns, publication of clinical guidelines, data observatories, and legal actions. Civil society organisations play a key advocacy role.
9Why is standardised data collection important in addressing obstetric violence?
Reliable, harmonised data is essential to measure prevalence, monitor practices, compare Member States, and guide policy decisions. Currently, lack of standard indicators limits EU-wide understanding.
10What role do civil society and institutions play in tackling obstetric violence?
They raise awareness, support women’s rights, contribute to research, push for legal reforms, and help build a public understanding of the issue. Their engagement is crucial for structural change.